happy hayrick
damn, this reliance damages stuff is getting confusing. i still have twenty pages of contracts ahead of me this evening, so i'll get right to the point.
i guess i always figured that eventually the profs would catch wind of this piece-of-shit blog, but i am still not happy that it has happened.
what would possess someone to tell our professors about menlovian? i'd imagine that the student who emailed pitler or told schneider was the same one who (in sixth grade) reminded the teacher that she had forgotten to assign that night's homework.
ultimately, however, i'm mad at myself. here's why:
it's true that i haven't said too many mean things about our profs on this blog, largely because i have basically liked all of them very much. i've been a sebok worshiper and a nan fanatic. i've always been a staunch robyn-defender, and though i bust on hella and pitler, i've always apreciated them as well for their sense of humor and the great stories they tell. and so far this semester, gora and jones seem to be fairly cool and interesting, and poser is turning out to be pretty much the greatest thing since sliced bread.
and i feel that 95% of menlovian's readers have always been respectful in what they write about our profs because, like me, they tend to like our professors overall. i'm not saying that people here aren't critical - they are, but there's nothing wrong with criticism. what worries me though is the mean-spirited comments, especially those that have surfaced in the last several weeks, particularly as grades have been coming in.
i sense that the vast majority of these vitriolic comments have been written by just a small handful of "anonymous" posters. i know from my conversations with you all both in and out of class that the majority of would never speak so scornfully about any of your classmates or professors.
but a few people have, and a few people still do, and a few of these people post these things on my site. and i have allowed them to do so. though i've preached "kind and gentle hayrick" throughout the five months of this menlovian experiment in terms of how we write about each other, i have allowed some pretty nasty things to be posted about our professors. for this, i am sorry.
what it boils down to is that our professors are part of the hayrick. the civility we extend toward one another should also be extended to them.
pedagogical criticism is fair game. so are good-natured observations about a professor's mannerisms, lecturing style, or personality. and of course, there's nothing wrong with complaining about how assignments and exams. i mean, if not here, where?
but what's not cool are personal attacks on a professor, wishing for a professor's death, or professing hatred for anyone at BLS. i should never have allowed these things to be posted on my blog; from now on, they will be deleted immediately.
***
these three weeks have been pretty much the longest three weeks of school i've ever experienced. fortunately, there's just one more class with poser, and then we can all enjoy what will hopefully be a nice weekend.
on a positive note, a triple-nomination sent to me this morning has brought us to a total of 19 nominations for wonderful people. (that is, 19 different people, four of whom were nominated more than once, for a total of more than 25 nominations!)
thanks to everyone who contributed. i'll be introducing you all to six more of your wonderful classmates throughout next week, starting first thing on monday morning. see you all then.
***
15 Comments:
Bravo, Menlove.
you're not alone lochner... though not many of us will admit it, a lot of women feel that the most attractive accessory a man can have is a ring on his finger.
Can someone tell me what we have to read up to for Contracts tommorow?
Thanks
i wrote down page 132
In the spirit of the happy hayrick, I would like to say a few nice things about Professor Schneider...
1. She's grown as a teacher in a major way since August.
2. The door to room 831 is always open, and she always seems happy to see me, and to answer all of my dumb questions patiently.
3. How many other professors have you had who actually cared about how your law school experience was going, and who asked you about these types of things. (Well, I guess that Nan did this as well, but you get the point.)
4. It's not her fault that legal writing is totally sucky any more than it is Hellerstein's fault that the Commerce Clause is boring.
5. She's pretty.
6. I just landed a paying job for this summer, partly on the strength of my memo #4.
Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
functioning alcholism is a gift, it keeps te darkeness in the corners of the room instead of riding you like one of those poneys that have a county fairs. And I say this hoeing poser doesn't get close enought to me to smell last nights whiskey on my breath at 11 am.
^ that was supposed to say 'hoping'
It's because if a man is doing his job, his girl feels sexy and sure and perhaps a little more adventurous... no doubt the reason you find these girls so much more attractive. And maybe it’s pheromones?
I'm a big believer in pheromones. Mostly because thats how I justify all the ugly guys I've hooked up with. Also, if her "man" was "doing his job," she probably wouldn't be giving you any signals in the first place.
Would anyone have to know about it if you did it?
i've been struggling with serena vs. venus. but after a lot of deliberation, i'd have to say that i would rather play tennis against serena. true, venus hits some of the cleanest shots with the prettiest strokes around, but serena is all about raw power. i figure that it would be a thrill to stare down one of her monstrous serves... so when it comes to who i'd rather... on the balance, i've got to go with serena.
For all you Tony fans out there, anyone remember the IIED case involving the Roman Catholic Church? We read an appeal written by one of Tennessee's intermediate appellate courts. Apparently the Tennessee Supreme Court didn't think much of its enshrinement in our casebook: it just recently reversed.
Tony's not happy about it. You can read his take on it at
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/sebok/20050124.html
I guess he'll have to update the casebook...
--Demian
Really? Come on people. I read this blog to NOT do work, not get extra credit.
I think the Bill-Gates-$10 million hypo becomes even more interesting if, somehow, he were able to guarantee that you would never be caught and/or prosecuted. It becomes less a question of your fear of societal disapproval and more one of your own values.
If it makes you feel any better I would not kill anyone for any amount of money
Post a Comment
<< Home