Friday, February 11, 2005

i've lost my mind

what an amazingly fun day this has been! between the point headers, the sweet summer job search bullshit, and the kick-ass 70 page reading on that fabulously fascinating subject known as the capability problem in contract law, it's been a day to remember.

on yesterday's message board, someone asked me, "Where's your blog theme from?"

now i'm not really sure what you mean by blog theme. the color scheme and header and all that is just a standard template provided by blogger.com. the title, "menlovian," is a reference to a great case we read in professor sebok's torts class last semester called vaughn v. menlove. it was about this dude menlove whose hayrick went up in flames which then damaged someone else's property. menlove's defense was that he was too stupid to know that he was supposed to have prevented such an occurence. sebok was constantly referring to things, people, and actions as "menlovian," i.e., idiotic. i sort of identified with the dude (menlove, not sebok). it just seemed to be a nice, catchy theme for my blog, and obviously the name stuck, and i've since written a buttload of entries as "menlove."

i'm not sure if that answers your question or not, but whatever. i've worked enough today.

i'm going to bed, because right now, everything i'm looking at looks pretty much like this:

Example

have a great weekend, everyone. and by the way, you may want to bring a flask or a 40 oz. to property class on monday...

6 Comments:

At 2:47 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

that picture makes me dizzy.

 
At 3:36 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Me too, but she's somehow alluring. I wouldn't mind shacking up with a cute asian honey who could pleasure me with two mouths at once.

 
At 2:54 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

strangely enough, that kid actually had some skills.

 
At 9:41 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

If you want to not use IE, which is a wise choice, try this.

 
At 4:32 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Are a minimum of 34% of us ready to work really hard only to get a shite grade on the brief and not be allowed to compete for Moot court? And the salt in the would of still being required to do an oral arguement?

I know I am, I've been kicking myself in the nuts to prepart fot the enevitable.

 
At 5:25 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

SHOULD THE DISTRICT COURT BE PHYSICALLY REPRIMANDED FOR ITS CRUEL TAUNTING AND HEARTLESS RIDICULE OF A MORBIDLY OBESE CONSTRUCTION WORKER, PARTICULARLY THEIR COMMENTS THAT HE WAS A “FAT STUPID CART-MONKEY” AND THAT HE SHOULD “STOP EATING OTHER MEMBERS OF THE CONSTRUCTION TEAM”?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home