Monday, March 07, 2005

moot means irrelevant, right?

i'm glad that you guys liked my rehnquist story from last time. thanks for the compliments, especially to the person who complimented me ten times. maybe someday i'll write a story that doesn't involve any sort of talking donkeys, overflowing toilets, dubbing of pornographic videos, or NAMBLA... though i doubt it.

also, thanks and mad props go out to "amused older bro" who dropped some major knowledge on all of our pathetic, puny little asses. i don't think that any other posting on any other message board this year made me feel quite so "o.k." about this whole process.

who is the lucky younger sibling of this amused older bro, i wonder?

i'm glad that the whole late-to-class debate is subsiding because, honestly, it was boring the hell out of me. someone asked for my opinion on the matter, so here you go:

i don't care. i don't notice so much when people come to school late. if i do, it doesn't bother me to have something to look at for five seconds. i'm not really that uptight. if it really bothers you (as it clearly does, to some of you at least), i'd suggest that rather than coming on here and calling people names like "stampy" anonymously, why not just approach the person like an adult after class and let them know that their continued disruptions are making it difficult for you to concentrate?

i've found that most people are rational adults who respond very well to civil, reasonable criticism. if they refuse to cooperate, then you can come on here and start the name-calling.

on a related note, wasn't "stampy" bart's elephant's name on the simpsons?

Example

yes, i believe that it was.

anyhow, if someone coming in late like that really makes you angry, i'd suggest that you find someone to have sex with. in my experience, i've found that sex (the physical act of love. coitus.) makes me care a lot less about all of the thousands of potentially-annoying people and things in the world.

speaking of sex, whatever happened to that dude theobald? did he finally get some trim, or what? theobald, fill us in, brother!

ok, so it's back to the normal grind this week. i feel tremendously relieved to have the moot court tryout behind me. for those of you who care about what goes on in my life, you won't be surprised to hear that i totally bombed both my opening statement and my cross-x. it was a total debacle.

i mentioned last week that my opponent was very smart, but i had no idea that she would be so friggin' prepared for the thing as well. as she was giving her opening statement, i knew that i was fucked, as she had the whole thing completely memorized, and also employed a variety of gestures, eye contact, and so on.

i, on the other hand, pretty much stammered and stuttered throughout the whole thing. the only gesture i made was to continually check to make sure that my suit jacket was still buttoned. i don't know why i kept doing it, but i couldn't help it. it was as if i thought that the butterflies in my stomach were going to push so hard against it that it would just pop off or something. the bottom line is that every ten seconds or so, my hand was touching my button. the judge guy cut me off before i was even finished with my opening, but i was relieved to have a break.

my oppenent then proceeded to pull off an amazing cross-x. she basically had everything from the packet completely memorized, and was able to make the witness look like a miserable lying fuck.

so then i got up there. by this point, i was pretty much ready to surrender, but i went through with it anyway. it was a miserable experience. every time the witness lied to me, i stood there, completely stupefied. i couldn't get any kind of rhythm going to my questions at all. at one point, i think i even caught two of the judges looking at each other and laughing at me.

but the worst thing was that my opponent kept on making objections throughout my whole thing. i didn't even know that we were allowed to do this, since no one from moot court had bothered to mention it in the packet they gave us. so whenever i managed to get a decent question out of my mouth, she was there to complain about it! i was so flustered and upset. the worst thing was that every time she objected, the judge guy kept looking at me and saying, "counselor, your response?"

now i didn't have a fucking clue how to respond. the only line that kept popping into my head was "point of parliamentary procedure," which i think was what otter said in animal house.

the bottom line is that i turned in - what else? - a totally menlovian effort, and there is absolutely NO chance that i'll be on the trial ad team. couple that with the fact that my brief grade pretty much rules out any chace of me making the other moot court team, and that makes me a two-time loser. and add to that the fact that my grades make it pretty much impossible for me to get onto any of the law reviews, and that makes it strike three against ol' menlove.

all i can really do now is hope that "amused older bro" knows what he's talking about.

9 Comments:

At 2:34 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You may not be a good student and you may not make moot court or law review, but you write a mighty fine blog that brings a fair bit of happiness into my life every day. Plus, you come off as a genuinely kind and thoughtful person. I'd imagine that Princess Strawberry Margarita is one lucky gal.

 
At 7:10 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

PAD and LAAW are having a joint clothing drive to benefit two separate organizations.

The Fortune Society (PAD)is a not-for-prof org that helps released prisoners start their lives over. These men and women have paid their debts and are staring the big job and apartment hunt.

Urban Women's Safe Haven (LAAW) is a battered women's shelter. These women basically need clothing for themselves and for their children along with any other appropriate items.

Please make a donation between now and next friday in the corner of the lounge near the soda machine.

We are looking for clothes, shoes, childrens items, books, household items, makeup, etc.

Please think of how great it would be if each person at BLS donated only one or two items!

Please don't start an obnoxious debate about me using the menlove board to solicit donations. I'm trying to get word out about a good thing. Thanks :-)

 
At 7:30 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Everyone remember when our friend M-Love messed up by talking about how glad he was to see the group email from Robyn?

This led me, and many others to believe that this was not yet another Menlovian red herring, but a bona fide mistake. From this mistake, one could infer that Menlove was in section 8, not section 9.

Menlove messed up again today. He said that at his moot court tryout, he gave the second opening statement, then gave the second cross examination.

Moot court tryouts were not formatted this way. It went: prosecution, defense, defense, prosecution.

From this, I believe that Menlove is a guy in section 8 who did not try out for trial ad.

By my calculations, this means that Menlove is one of five people. However, two of these people can be eliminated just by common sense.

You're good Menlove, but you're not that good. I'm comin to get you...

 
At 8:17 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bart- "coool, I want an elephant."

Lisa - " You had an elephant. his name was Stampy and you loved him very much."

 
At 8:24 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

menlove is for sure section 9--too many references from last semester with Nan and Robyn.

it's either Sam or Mark.

 
At 9:52 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

My last post was ignored (how convienient) that I think Menlove is Mark. This is b/c he is in section 9, came back this semester w/ a new girlfriend from our class (Carla = strawberry margarita), and did trial ad on friday. After realizing he spilled too much he KEPT referring to his opposing council as "she" so when we looked it up we would be thrown off. NOT ME MENLOVE... OR SHOULD I SAY MARK. Also, I was P and the format was PDPD in my try out. Although to be honest I didn't really understand the confusion in the first place, but I guess I'm slow.

 
At 11:43 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Seriously, menlove. It's only a matter of time.

I, for one, am rooting for you to hold out as long as possible in revealing your identity. I think it would be fantastic if you managed to ride out the year. Next year it's going to be impossible though. Someone will triangulate who you are from the classes you take. But I'm still rooting for your anonymity.

That said, I do make it a point never to check Menlovian in civ pro (section 7 here), because I always wonder if you're sitting behind me. I figure if I don't get the satisfaction of knowing who you are, you don't get the satisfaction of seeing me read your blog. But the day that you 'out' yourself, menlovian, is the day I make it my homepage. :)

 
At 12:59 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You guys got me. I'm Menlove.

Mark

 
At 1:52 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ya know, there's one person in our class that doesn't get enough credit. So here's to him:

There once was a man whose name was Tom,
In the face of the nine kings he wasn't so calm,
And when our nation needed him, he volunteered to fight,
Formalism? Functionalism? He knew what was right.

So after he went and he served our nation,
He went and he got his edumication.
He looked at his options and he liked what he saw,
He went and pursued a career in the law.

He had a professor whose name was T Hella,
And he was a nice, albeit liberal fella.
Although the professor liked Roe versus Wade,
Tom said, "A mistake these nine kings they have made."

So Tom disagreed with the right to abort,
And instead liked the words of the old Lochner court,
And Wednesday we'll find out what he utters next,
But we do know the message is "Stick to the text!"

 

Post a Comment

<< Home